Great efforts to make something fake look real from r/exjw
Interesting videos at http://TinyURL.com/JWleakedVideos
great efforts to make something fake look real from r/exjw.
interesting videos at http://tinyurl.com/jwleakedvideos.
Great efforts to make something fake look real from r/exjw
Interesting videos at http://TinyURL.com/JWleakedVideos
gdpr congregation record of processing activities: https://1drv.ms/f/s!amcrvjcxi6m6gx7oc1gksxolaeae.
...and associated files.... .
letter to boe dated january 6, 2017: https://1drv.ms/b/s!amcrvjcxi6m6gxyqlciog-dt815_.
Care to share?
https://www.reddit.com/r/exjw/comments/8wwsqq/youtube_takedowns_a_waste_of_time/?utm_source=reddit-android.
Hi Carla. The WayBackMachine is awesome. You’ll also find this site interesting: https://TinyURL.com/JWleakedVideos
https://www.reddit.com/r/exjw/comments/8wwsqq/youtube_takedowns_a_waste_of_time/?utm_source=reddit-android.
gdpr congregation record of processing activities: https://1drv.ms/f/s!amcrvjcxi6m6gx7oc1gksxolaeae.
...and associated files.... .
letter to boe dated january 6, 2017: https://1drv.ms/b/s!amcrvjcxi6m6gxyqlciog-dt815_.
Schools
Repeatedly in court: "We do not operate a Sunday school, sponsor any other school. Therefore, we are not subject to laws requiring us to act responsibly with children. We're not responsible for anything!"
gdpr congregation record of processing activities: https://1drv.ms/f/s!amcrvjcxi6m6gx7oc1gksxolaeae.
...and associated files.... .
letter to boe dated january 6, 2017: https://1drv.ms/b/s!amcrvjcxi6m6gxyqlciog-dt815_.
.
uk branch update - summer 2018: https://1drv.ms/b/s!amcrvjcxi6m6gx0iyad_9mewnlku.
UK Branch update - Summer 2018: https://1drv.ms/b/s!AmCrvJcXI6M6gX0iyad_9mewNLKu
anyone got any more info they can share, or comments to add on this question: .
are jw assemblies and conventions hit with a stealth tax?why do i ask?
well, please take a look at these leaked docs.... s-330-e_assembly-guidelines - https://1drv.ms/b/s!amcrvjcxi6m6gxlpiqofwa6ho52l.
Anyone got any more info they can share, or comments to add on this question:
Are JW assemblies and conventions hit with a STEALTH TAX?
Why do I ask? Well, please take a look at these leaked docs...
S-330-E_Assembly-Guidelines - https://1drv.ms/b/s!AmCrvJcXI6M6gXlPIQOFWa6Ho52l
Appendix B (p.48)
MATTERS TO BE CARED FOR AFTER THE ASSEMBLY
Determine the new target balance for the circuit’s account.—See Instructions for Circuit Accounting (S-331).
S-331E_Instructions-for-circuit-accounting - https://1drv.ms/b/s!AmCrvJcXI6M6gXpkmKkhD-paBgV3
Target Balance (p.8, par.8)
Expenses that will be incurred during the next assembly, such as a per-publisher contribution that is made for the use of an Assembly Hall, should not be included in the target balance.
Per-publisher contribution should not be included? Why?
Normal Operating Expenditures (p.1, par.7)
Normal operating expenditures include per-publisher contributions for use of an Assembly Hall
Are these directions now stating that a "per-publisher contribution" (determined and enforced by the branch) - aka "head tax" - should be hidden away in the accounts and filed simply as "normal operating expenses"? (Never announced or published) What would be the reaction of the average publisher if they found out that the reason for the high "expenses" announced at the assembly or convention was because their organization taxes everyone who attends? Would they begin to think that this was an organization more interested in money than mercy?
(Looking for some interesting videos? https://rutube.ru/video/person/689813/ )
so, this week on the clm there was an interesting comment at our kh.. under the "apply yourself to the field ministry" portion this week, there was the bible study assignment based on the publication: who are doing jehovah’s will today?
published in 2016. the material was from lesson 28 "what can be found on our website?
there is a footnote at the bottom that reads: .
If you listen to any recorded apostasy judicial hearing, or recording of a call to Bethel, the clever JW Watchtower-mind-conditioned men take this stance:
Even though you "know", state "I don't know about that" or "I'm not familiar with that". Then explain "So I can't comment on that"
This deception attempts to make the one attempting to comment on facts look unreasonable if they push the issue, because the other person cannot be expected to comment on things that they are not familiar with.
https://rutube.ru/video/689bd862d9b1ebdf0f395ad32bda9346/.
https://rutube.ru/video/a87936cf49df523444115a6f15995475/.